| Dancer in the Dark |
You have to hand it to Danish director Lars von Trier. No matter what he does as a filmmaker, it is always intriguing and challenging to the audience. One of the men behind the Dogme 95 tenets of movie-making (a proposal that has recently come under fire as having been a hoax), von Trier experiments with various forms and styles to craft his individualistic view of the world. While he does have a penchant of late for focusing on naive, one might even say, childlike heroines, he creates a stunning world in which these women exist. Dancer in the Dark, reportedly the third in an unofficial trilogy begun with Breaking the Waves, premiered at the Cannes Film Festival where it divided audiences -- they either cheered or booed -- and picked up top honors, including the Palme d'Or for von Trier and the Best Actress award for Bjork. It was also selected for the opening night slot for the 38th New York Film Festival where it proved to be a popular ticket and once again confounded some and delighted others. Dancer in the Dark serves as an homage to classic American movie musicals and an attempt to fashion a 21st-century version of such films. Von Trier's success -- or failure, depending on your point of view -- lies in the way he has captured the material by utilizing some 100 cameras placed at various spots around the set. The director allowed his actors to have freedom in their work by not constricting them or their movements and by encouraging them to trust their instincts. Abandoning the rehearsal process early in production, von Trier instead encouraged his cast -- headed by Icelandic singer Bjork, French diva Catherine Deneuve, Swedish actor Peter Stormare and American character actor David Morse -- to improvise while he operated the camera himself. He also takes great pains to delineate the musical sequences from the more mundane world of the characters. On the whole, he has crafted a hybrid, something that is gritty and "real" infused with the sentiment and fantasy of the great musicals. While von Trier falls into his usual trap of allowing some scenes to run on far too long (Dancer in the Dark runs close to 2-½ hours) and including some extraneous footage, he also manages to elicit some extraordinary work from his multitalented cast. Much ink has already been spilled over reported clashes with his star, Bjork. Originally approached to write the film's score, she responded so intensely to the leading character of Selma Jezkovic, a Czech immigrant working in a factory in the American Northwest while trying to be a single parent to her preteen son, that von Trier insisted only she could play the role. Although she had limited acting experience, Bjork jumped at the chance to collaborate and finally agreed to portray his heroine. (""Every cell of me was literally Selma" is how she described the process.) First seen in rehearsals for an amateur production of The Sound of Music Selma clearly has something wrong. Perhaps it's the thick lenses in her glasses that is the tip off, and indeed the audience comes to learn that she is suffering from a hereditary condition that will eventually leave her blind. Determined that her son will not suffer the same fate, she hoards every penny she can from her menial job, taking on extra work (in the form of assembling pins and needles in the holders to be sold at notion shops) and telling her friends that she is sending money home to Czechoslovakia to her father. In her spare time, she and her co-worker and best friend Kathy (Deneuve) go to the movies where Kathy describes in detail the scenes from the old musicals unspooling, much to the chagrin of the other patrons. The basic story of the film revolves around a situation arising after Selma's landlord and neighbor Bill (David Morse) confides his financial problems to her and then falsely accuses her of stealing from him. Her reactions set in motion a chain of events that ultimately ends in tragedy. Hardly the stuff of musicals, but that's the point. Although plot has never been Von Trier's strong suit, he is attempting to forge a new form of entertainment that marries melodrama with songs. There are numerous holes in the storyline which many of its detractors take enormous delight in detailing but to do so misses the intention. Von Trier is not re-creating a period (the film is set in the early 1960s) or a place (the Pacific Northwest) but rather is creating a mythical version of that filtered through the prism of cinema. While it is arguable just how successful he has been, he should not be faulted for taking a creative license If one examines the great musicals in American cinema history, the plot is often shaky at best. Indeed, with few exceptions (say, Show Boat), even the Broadway shows of the 1930s and 40s were short on story. The key to the success of films like Gold Diggers of 1933, Top Hat and The Band Wagon lay in the score and the choreography. The rest was just the mechanics on which to hang the musical numbers. In those crucial areas, however, Dancer in the Dark is inconsistent. A couple of the numbers soar but all too often the prosaic lyrics (by von Trier with an assist by Icelandic poet Sjon Siggurdson) and Vince Paterson's uneven dance direction tend to sabotage the film's intent. The result, then, is a noble attempt to push the envelope that doesn't quite achieve its lofty goals. The musical sequences represent Selma's inner world and the first few work well. While working the night shift at the factory, Selma begins to daydream. The percussive noises of the machines begin to coalesce and create music and suddenly she and her co-workers are dancing and singing. It is spine-tingling moment that possesses great promise. Von Trier shifts film stock and the colors take on a richer, deeper hue while his use of the multiple cameras hidden around the set allow for odd angles. For a brief moment, one sees into Selma's world and comes to understand her and her imaginative will. Even the second sequence, which involves a passing train and open fields (and in some ways is an "homage" to Robert Wise's screen version of The Sound of Music) sparkles. But the next "number" involving the aftermath of a crime falls flat, although a courtroom sequence that allows veteran Oscar winner Joel Grey a chance to strut his stuff is vigorous and engaging. The success or failure of the film rests with Bjork and her portrayal of Selma. The camera clearly loves her and her dark, elfin beauty is captured well. In the early scenes, though, she is awkward and uncomfortable and her performance seems almost amateurish. One begins to cringe in dread of what is to come, but she grows on you. There is a spirit to her that eventually takes over and Selma emerges as a full-bodied characterization. A highly instinctual performer (by her own admission, she would be hard pressed to duplicate a scene exactly), Bjork dominates Dancer in the Dark. Not that the other actors are slouches. Catherine Deneuve, who has matured into a fine actress, is terrific as Kathy. Peter Stormare brings a gentle quality to his shy suitor while Cara Seymour is memorable as Selma's mercenary landlady. David Morse once again proves he is one of the USA's best character players undertaking a vaguely sinister part of a police officer driven to desperate measures. Comedienne Siobhan Fallon offers a memorable turn as a sympathetic prison guard and Von Trier stalwarts like Udo Kier, Stellan Skarsgard and Jean-Marc Barr appear in small roles. One can admire the craftsmanship that went into Dancer in the Dark, and revel in the performances and the occasional moments when the song and dance sequences take momentary flight. Undoubtedly the film will continue to spark heated debates, and perhaps that is its greatest achievement. After all, I'm hard pressed to recall the last movie musical that sparked debates about its artistic merits. Rating: B MPAA rating: R for some violence Running time: 137 mins. |
| © 2008 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |